Row covers for management of insect-vectored viral diseases of tomato in Uganda
Abstract
336 words
Tomato production in Uganda is constrained by among others use of low quality planting
materials, non-availability of inputs, sub-optimum agronomic practices, pests and diseases.
Studies have shown that viral diseases have quickly become a major threat to tomato production
in Uganda. The objective of this study was to develop safe, easy to use and effective
management strategies for the rampant insect vectored viral diseases of tomato (Solanum
lycopersicum). The study was conducted at Makerere University Agricultural Research
Institute Kabanyolo (MUARIK). In a Randomized Complete Block Design with three
replications; four treatments: (i) Insect proof plastic row covers applied from transplanting
to 14 days after transplanting (DAT), (ii) ) Insect proof plastic row covers applied from
transplanting to 28 DAT, (iii) Insect proof plastic row covers applied from transplanting to
36 DAT, (iv) the uncovered control were considered. Tomato variety MT-56 was used.
Results over two growing seasons in 2013 showed that for the duration of the application,
the insect proof plastic row covers kept aphids and white flies off the protected plants but
were encountered on unprotected plants. Treatments significantly affected incidence and
severity of Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) and Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus (TYLCV).
Mean disease severity for TYLCV was 0.29, 0.317, 0.097 and 0.38 for treatments (i),
(ii),(iii) and (iv) respectively. Mean disease severity for CMV was 0.407,0.413, 0.043 and
0.603 for treatments (i), (ii),(iii) and (iv) respectively. In the second season mean disease
severity for TYLCV was 0.353, 0.300, 0.157 and 0.450 for treatments (i),(ii),(iii) and (iv)
respectively. Mean disease severity for CMV was 0.443,0.437,0.103 and 0.677 for treatments
(i),(ii),(iii)and (iv) respectively. Plants protected for 36 DAT had the lowest disease severity.
Despite the low disease rates on plants protected for 28 and 36 DAT, there was yield
penalty in these treatments with average yields of 4 and 2 fruits respectively compared to
average yields of 7 for plants protected for 14 days and the uncovered plants. Plants protected
for only 14 DAT had the highest yield, followed by the untreated ones.
Subjects
2 categoriesRelated papers
More in Working Document Series →- Detection, isolation and baseline characterization of indigenous PhlD+ fluorescent Pseudomonas species for the control of bean root rot and coffee wilt disease in Uganda
- Report on the implementation of the RUFORUM Post-Doctoral Fellowship: Enhancing crop productivity and household food security among smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe
- Economic assessment of factors influencing the magnitude of losses due to fall armyworm: The case of maize infestation
- Application of X-ray micro-computed tomography to detect bruise damage of pomegranate (cv. Wonderful) fruit