Strengthening capacity for effective smallholder farmers support through university, research and government partnership
Abstract
314 words
There is general consensus that the linear prescriptive model of technology generation
and transfer from researchers to farmers often through extension has failed to deliver
expected outcomes. Past approaches to agricultural research and development, the “linear
model” and subsequent models had a design flaw in focussing on the supply of new
knowledge from research to farmers; rather than providing a mechanism for nurturing the
innovative capacity of multi-stakeholders to address recurrent production challenges in
complex farming systems. These approaches tend to be sectorial and fragmented with little
or no involvement of relevant stakeholders. The Agricultural Research Council (ARC)
partnered with the Universities of Limpopo (UL), Venda (Univern) and Fort Hare (UFH)
and applied International Centre for Development Oriented Research in Agriculture-
ICRA’s Integrated Agricultural Research for Development (IAR4D) approach to enhance
the impacts of their research and thus stimulate the agricultural production performance of
the rural communities they serve. This presented an opportunity to address complex issues
that require participation and contributions from a range of stakeholders. The capacity to
conduct participatory action research has been gained through actual exposure of IAR4D
teams to real-world challenges and by engaging in processes of interactive learning and
collective action. The ARD teams were composed of staff of universities, ARC, government,
and students as there is realisation that both staff and students lack competencies to
effectively make effective changes required for a more inclusive economic development
and transformation in South Africa. Success was particularly realized in exposing trained
staff and students to a different way of doing research that provides opportunity for better
engagement with communities and other relevant stakeholders. However, there has been
low ‘adoption rate’ of the ARD processes. as none of the partner universities structurally
and wholly integrated the approach in their research agenda to date. Whilst there are
pockets of adoption, structural change is yet to be seen at UL, UFH and UniVen.
Subjects
1 categoryRelated papers
More in Working Document Series →- Mediating role of organizational support and commitment on the relationship between psychological empowerment and innovativeness of farmer organizations in central Uganda
- Post-doctoral fellowship experiences and lessons gained during the inter-disciplinary research approach regarding innovations among farmer groups
- Assessment of the effectiveness of communication channels in dissemination of fall armyworm information on maize production in Kenya
- Factors influencing maize farmers’ access and utilisation of Agricultural Information in Tolon and Kumbungu Districts in Northern Ghana